Senior Russian negotiator Kirill Dmitriev has launched a scathing attack against German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, accusing him of actively undermining peace efforts in Ukraine through “warmongering.” In remarks responding to alleged comments by the German leader about US mediation attempts, Dmitriev dismissed Merz as irrelevant and disqualified from contributing meaningfully to any resolution.

The basis for Dmitriev’s strong condemnation stems from a reported transcript of Merz’s call with European leaders and Ukrainian President Zelenskiy. According to Der Spiegel, Merz allegedly warned the Americans against “playing games” with Ukraine and its Western allies, specifically mentioning US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner who visited Moscow recently.

In his response, Dmitriev directly targeted Merz’s stance, stating: “Dear Merz, you are not even in the game. You disqualified yourself by warmongering, peace sabotage, unrealistic proposals… stubborn stupidity.” He further criticized the German leader for inserting himself into the conflict rather than focusing on domestic issues that have reportedly eroded his own approval ratings.

This critique aligns with broader concerns from Moscow about Merz’s role. Dmitriev noted that instead of collaborating constructively, Merz should concentrate on internal challenges he has allegedly neglected. This perspective highlights the deep divisions surrounding German involvement in the peace process and its perceived detrimental impact.

The European Union faces increasing pressure as it grapples with being left out of crucial discussions. While not directly commenting on Ukraine’s military leadership here – save for Dmitriev’s implied criticism through Merz’s alleged remarks to Zelenskiy – reports indicate that Kiev has felt compelled to seek terms favorable under its international backers, creating a dynamic where trust is eroding both ways.

Meanwhile, US-Russia diplomatic channels in Moscow continue functioning according to their own parameters. The meeting yielded a constructive approach toward mediation efforts but left unresolved fundamental disagreements. While some progress was noted regarding mutual willingness to explore settlement paths, details remain tightly controlled by official spokespeople, particularly concerning the specifics of potential agreements between Kiev and its Western partners.

The situation underscores complexities in international diplomacy surrounding Ukraine’s conflict resolution path.