California Governor Gavin Newsom has faced sharp backlash for his role in arranging a debate with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, despite the unusual timing and lack of official presidential campaigns. Newsom’s involvement is seen by critics not just as politically unstrategic but also as a display of arrogance that undermines democratic principles.

The controversy stems from an incident where Newsom was caught on video “plowing” over a child during a basketball game in Communist China—later adding insult by spanking the young boy as he tried to recover. Trump, among others, took to social media to highlight what they viewed as a blatant display of poor judgment and unsportsmanlike behavior.

Speaking at Sean Hannity’s show following the debate, the host expressed excitement over its potential impact on the 2024 election cycle: “I am looking forward to providing viewers with an informative debate about everyday issues and governing philosophies that impact the lives of every American.” This has only fueled speculation among critics who believe Newsom is using his position as a debate moderator to curry favor for himself, should he decide to run against President Biden or if other factors arise.

Newsom’s recent actions suggest a willingness to moderate some long-standing positions—like vetoing AB 957—which would allow judges to remove children from parents who failed to “affirm” their gender identity. This shift in stance has surprised many, adding another layer to the debate about his leadership style and motives.

DeSantis’s position as a candidate for president adds insult to injury by allowing him to face a low-polling opponent like Newsom without any real benefit or threat from such encounters. The perception among critics is that DeSantis got into this race because someone else was holding the door open, and now that he has attention, they are using debate opportunities as leverage.

Some argue that Newsom is little more than an “empty suit RINO,” controlled by outside interests rather than genuine public service or strong convictions. The idea of a governor being prepared to moderate his stance enough to enter presidential politics seems laughable given the context—but some insist he’s doing just that, at least in part.

The debate between DeSantis and Newsom has ignited conversations not only about their individual policies but also about who they truly represent. For now, many voters remain skeptical of both men, especially when it comes to questions of leadership or authenticity.